| Author |
Message |
MaryJFAdvanced Member
Posts: 103 Joined: 26 Nov 2005 Location: Menands (Albany) NY
|
|
Posted: Sat Dec 09, 2006 7:38 pm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
eagamesExpert Member
Posts: 3013 Joined: 15 Nov 2005
|
|
Posted: Sat Dec 09, 2006 8:38 pm |
|
|
I can't see much in the picture but from your description it sounds like a die clash. Thats when the die was damaged by being hit by the other die so the image would be an outline of the obv as if you were looking through the coin.
If you can get better pic somebody can verify that it is or not.
_________________ Ed
|
|
|
|
|
 |
wavysteps2003Expert Member
Posts: 1344 Joined: 25 Feb 2005
|
|
Posted: Sun Dec 10, 2006 7:37 pm |
|
|
Hi Mary - The pictures that you have posted show a double die clash (two independant die clashes) with one of them being fairly strong. From the looks of the reverse, it appears to be a 1974, but that is just a guess.
Somewhere in this forum, COOP has posted a great article on die clashes that he did and the accompanying pictures will show you exactly what has happened to your coin. If you can not find the post, just PM COOP and he will more than likely be happy to assist you.
WAVYSTEPS2003 aka BJ Neff
|
|
|
|
|
 |
StevenExpert Member
Posts: 1298 Joined: 30 Nov 2005 Location: S/E Missouri
|
|
Posted: Sun Dec 10, 2006 7:40 pm |
|
|
BJ,
I'd like to test myself on your saying '74. Is that due the the size and placement of the FG.
Steven
|
|
|
|
|
 |
wavysteps2003Expert Member
Posts: 1344 Joined: 25 Feb 2005
|
|
Posted: Sun Dec 10, 2006 7:45 pm |
|
|
That is what I am basing my opinion on. Also, the steps do show some definition, unlike the 1980's steps.
BJ
|
|
|
|
|
 |
StevenExpert Member
Posts: 1298 Joined: 30 Nov 2005 Location: S/E Missouri
|
|
Posted: Sun Dec 10, 2006 7:56 pm |
|
|
Well maybe I am beginning to learn and retain a bit, finally.
Steven
|
|
|
|
|
 |
wavysteps2003Expert Member
Posts: 1344 Joined: 25 Feb 2005
|
|
Posted: Sun Dec 10, 2006 7:58 pm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
DickExpert Member
Posts: 5780 Joined: 21 Sep 2006 Location: Rialto, CA.
|
|
Posted: Sun Dec 10, 2006 8:51 pm |
|
|
MaryJF, that is a die clash! I have one identical, and when I found mine, I like you, didn't have a clue! I'm not sure who was first, but several of our members, let me know all about it.
Now the experts are all trying to outdo each other, by telling the date of the clashed coin. The fact is, they are probably right! Thanks to them, the rest of us tend to learn a bit more about our favorite hobby!
Later...I checked mine, and it is 1985-P. The area in the bay(s), to Abe's right, look to be the rim. not clear enough to tell
Dick
_________________ " Deja Moo: The feeling that you've heard this bull before".
Last edited by Dick on Sun Dec 10, 2006 11:34 pm; edited 1 time in total
|
|
|
|
|
 |
MaryJFAdvanced Member
Posts: 103 Joined: 26 Nov 2005 Location: Menands (Albany) NY
|
|
Posted: Sun Dec 10, 2006 10:34 pm |
|
|
The coin I've pictured is a 92 P. I guess I'm lost as to why it was clashed with a 74, or is it just a guess that this coin IS a 74?. I'm going to look back and see if I can find Coop's post on die clashes, and if I can't find it, I'll just have to ask.
Thanks for all the responses. Little by little I'm learning. Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
 |
eagamesExpert Member
Posts: 3013 Joined: 15 Nov 2005
|
|
Posted: Sun Dec 10, 2006 10:55 pm |
|
|
Those new pics are better!
Yes it's a die clas. It's reverse is clashed with its own 1992 obv die.
They were just trying to guess the date by looking at the reverse but guesed wrong.
_________________ Ed
|
|
|
|
|
 |
DickExpert Member
Posts: 5780 Joined: 21 Sep 2006 Location: Rialto, CA.
|
|
Posted: Sun Dec 10, 2006 11:48 pm |
|
|
MaryJF, I don't really know why it would be with a different die. I would expect that the dies clashed, due to the lack of an incoming planchet to strike, and the clash occurred. I was going to ask how, or why that could occur, but then the "grey matter" kicked in, and I realized that there are subtle differences, that are not normally noticed, (unless one is a variety collector), which would allow this to happen. Gentlemen, what is your opinion???
Dick
_________________ " Deja Moo: The feeling that you've heard this bull before".
|
|
|
|
|
 |
wavysteps2003Expert Member
Posts: 1344 Joined: 25 Feb 2005
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 11, 2006 9:21 am |
|
|
Hi Mary - I just guessed that it was a 1974 Lincoln cent. Thought that the designer's initals were a bit larger than normal and with the wide AM it put it in that year. Oh well, got to be wrong once this year -----------LOL.
BJ
|
|
|
|
|
 |
eagamesExpert Member
Posts: 3013 Joined: 15 Nov 2005
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 11, 2006 11:21 am |
|
|
Dick,
For most clashes you can assume the clash is from the other die but there are a few known types that are not.
The main coins I know of where the clash is from something other than the same coin is a few well known rare Flying Eagle cents, There's one well known type where the cent is clashed with a 20 cent piece, another with a quarter, another with a half dollar, another with a $10 or $20 gold coin. They're all listed by FS so you can see them in your CPG. I have no idea what the mint was doing by pairing those cent dies with other denomination dies. It's a mystery why they paired the cent die with another denomination other than maybe they were changing a press from one denomination to another and swapped one side then ran the press.
Check this out, it's the one clashed with a half dollar.
http://cgi.ebay.com/1857-Flying-Eagle-Cent-SEGS-XF-40-Seated-Half-Clash_W0QQitemZ280039831670QQihZ018QQcategoryZ11942QQrdZ1QQssPageNameZWD1VQQcmdZViewItem
_________________ Ed
|
|
|
|
|
 |
coppercoinsSite Admin
Posts: 2809 Joined: 29 Jun 2003 Location: Springfield, Missouri.
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:03 pm |
|
|
I almost immediately placed the coin at 1990-1992, but unfortunately the cat was out of the bag before I got to the thread. The 1974 reverse has many different features from that of the early 1990s.
_________________ C. D. Daughtrey
owner, developer
www.coppercoins.com
cd@coppercoins.com
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|