new finds

[ldarrellc]

some i believe are good others...... well you decide and tell me.

2003D



2005



1993D

[Steven]

Darrell,
The 2003D shows the normal column that extends into bay 1.
The 2005 has doubling of the sixth column and knee although minor.
The 1993D shows a separation of the copper layer. Quite common.

Just my opinion though

Steven

[ldarrellc]

on the 2003D i am talking about the doubling on the inside of the bay above the step. and the 1993D looks like the 1994.

[eagames]

I have seen those ones that look like the doubling on the inside of the bay above the step but I think that's actualy where they polished that corner and it looks like doubling. It looks like the corner of the bay is filled in. It's because they polished that corner on the die or it erroded from use.

Those longer weak columns may be plating lifted but it's hard to tell. If you have duplicates of them that would rule out lifted plating. Tough to be sure on them. There is a new 94 DDR with a long weak column (not the well known 94 DDR) and it has a similar look but stronger:

http://www.coppercoins.com/lincoln/diestate.php?date=1994&die_id=1994p1dr003&die_state=mds

[Dick]

ED, I have some, (at least one), with the same indications inside, and outside, the bays, as the 1993D. I can't post a photo yet, Photo unit still down.
Dick

[coppercoins]

Steven has this one right as far as I can see...but this should be posted in the die variety section, not the error section.