| Author |
Message |
jstraw13Member
Posts: 96 Joined: 16 Feb 2008 Location: New Jersey
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 02, 2008 8:27 am |
|
|
Hello Everyone,
This one has me baffled. It's a 1901 IHC that looks like it's been struckover twice on the obverse, but with a ***7? The reverse looks like it was hammered because the letters are indented and backwards. Your thoughts?
Obverse shots: Letters and number are raised.
Reverse shots: Letters are indented and backwards.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
DickExpert Member
Posts: 5780 Joined: 21 Sep 2006 Location: Rialto, CA.
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 02, 2008 12:42 pm |
|
|
I may be wrong, (and am very often), but it looks like someone has put the coin in with another, and put a LOT of pressure on them. Enough ti transfer the devices onto the other, maybe trying to create a clash, ot maybe even more far-fetched, a double struck coin. It does not look like any coin I would want.
Dick
_________________ " Deja Moo: The feeling that you've heard this bull before".
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Bob PSite Admin
Posts: 3482 Joined: 01 Jul 2003 Location: Niceville, Florida
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 02, 2008 2:20 pm |
|
|
The reverse marking were post mint made with a modern Lincoln cent as evidenced by the motto 'IN GOD WE TRUST'. The obverse is a little more intriguing though. It almost looks like a counter clash of some sort. I will leave that up to one of the error coin specialists to comment on.
_________________ Bob Piazza
Site Admin/Moderator
Attributer/Photographer
bobp@coppercoins.com
mustbebob1@gmail.com
|
|
|
|
|
 |
eagamesExpert Member
Posts: 3013 Joined: 15 Nov 2005
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 02, 2008 2:56 pm |
|
|
Hmmmm...
My 2 cents... before the real experts speak
The obv stuff initialy looks interesting but the reverse was done by smashing the coin in a vice with a Lincoln obv against the IHC rev.
Because it's reverse was in a vice smashed with a lincoln (against the IHC rev) my bet is on the other side (against the IHC obv) it might have had a piece of soft metal so it created a soft die in that metal then they moved the coin and that soft metal that already had the (neg) imprint of the IHC obv made the second IHC obverse markings. That explains why the IHC obv is not a negative but the lincolns IGWT on the rev is a negative.
I vote it's totaly made in a vice after mint, it's actualy a vice/soft die job.
Just my vote... Let's see what others think.
_________________ Ed
|
|
|
|
|
 |
jstraw13Member
Posts: 96 Joined: 16 Feb 2008 Location: New Jersey
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 02, 2008 3:18 pm |
|
|
|
I completely agree with the comments on the reverse. The obverse is the more interesting aspect. Especially the number 7 under the 'D' of UNITED. Wouldn't it take an awful lot of pressure to do this in a vice?
|
|
|
|
|
 |
eagamesExpert Member
Posts: 3013 Joined: 15 Nov 2005
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 02, 2008 3:32 pm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
DickExpert Member
Posts: 5780 Joined: 21 Sep 2006 Location: Rialto, CA.
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 02, 2008 3:34 pm |
|
|
These little "beauties" are not just the "old garage job. There are hydraulic peress that can exert many tons of pressure. and in the Auto-body repair industry, the "porta-powers" have a lot of force, and are easily set up. All it takes is a bit of creativity,and "an ulterior motive", and one can do more than you realize!
Dick
_________________ " Deja Moo: The feeling that you've heard this bull before".
|
|
|
|
|
 |
coopExpert Member
Posts: 3402 Joined: 17 Sep 2003 Location: Arizona
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 02, 2008 4:12 pm |
|
|
A medium size vise can do the expect affect. Remember these are copper planchets and make an easy impression in them from another coin. It funny that the squeezed coins are usually the same denomination? But the mirror image created give it away along with the devices that are higher making an impression of a coin rather than one from a die which is a negative of a coin.
_________________ Richard S. Cooper
You may be only one person in the world, but you may also be the world to one person.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
jstraw13Member
Posts: 96 Joined: 16 Feb 2008 Location: New Jersey
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 02, 2008 4:22 pm |
|
|
|
Thanks all. Thought I might have stumbled across something with this one.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
mikediamondAdvanced Member
Posts: 191 Joined: 09 Oct 2003 Location: Western Illinois
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 02, 2008 8:14 pm |
|
|
The obverse was struck (or squeezed against) a fake die. The soft, blended overlap is diagnostic of such crude fakes.
_________________ President of CONECA; Host of Error Coin Information Exchange (Yahoo:Groups). Opinions rendered do not necessarily reflect those held by any organization I am a member of.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|