| Author |
Message |
kenSenior Member
Posts: 584 Joined: 05 Jan 2008 Location: Phila.,Pa.
|
|
Posted: Sat Apr 04, 2009 9:15 am |
|
|
Found this this morning going through a roll purchased while I was in Milwalkee last summer from the same seller that I have posted many finds in past threads.Has all the markers except that the top of the R is also filled and that is not listed on site.Also looks like a ddr and I'll post pics of that next.I'm guessing it's a later die state as the IGWT are not as dramatic as on site(a bit weaker but seen).Is this the 002 Any thoughts
|
|
|
|
|
 |
kenSenior Member
Posts: 584 Joined: 05 Jan 2008 Location: Phila.,Pa.
|
|
Posted: Sat Apr 04, 2009 9:31 am |
|
|
Here's some shots of the reverse.Looks like some doubling on the wheat stalkes.The dots seem elongated e/w with some doubling also seen on E.Pluribus Unim.There are no ddr's listed for the vdb type reverse on site.I know my pics will make it tough.Try to see if anything is seen
Is it anything for the reverse
|
|
|
|
|
 |
coppercoinsSite Admin
Posts: 2809 Joined: 29 Jun 2003 Location: Springfield, Missouri.
|
|
Posted: Sat Apr 04, 2009 9:35 am |
|
|
I cannot really tell for sure if this is the same die, but I do agree that it appears to at least be a class 6 DDO.
_________________ C. D. Daughtrey
owner, developer
www.coppercoins.com
cd@coppercoins.com
|
|
|
|
|
 |
kenSenior Member
Posts: 584 Joined: 05 Jan 2008 Location: Phila.,Pa.
|
|
Posted: Sat Apr 04, 2009 9:43 am |
|
|
Thanks Chuck.I know I need to get a scope to show these better.That is at the top of my list when I get back to work.The main difference I see on the coin is that the top loop of the R is also filled in addition to the chip under the bar as listed on site.Later die state possibly than the 1 listed on site
|
|
|
|
|
 |
coppercoinsSite Admin
Posts: 2809 Joined: 29 Jun 2003 Location: Springfield, Missouri.
|
|
Posted: Sat Apr 04, 2009 2:28 pm |
|
|
I saw all of this in your first post above. I cannot tell what the other markers might be on your coin, but the doubling does not look as strong in the date area as 1909P-1DO-002, so it leads me to believe this could possibly be something different - possibly a different doubled die, and possibly not a doubled die at all. I would just have to see it up close to tell anything for sure.
_________________ C. D. Daughtrey
owner, developer
www.coppercoins.com
cd@coppercoins.com
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|