coppercoins.com
 
Index div  FAQ  div  Search  div  Memberlist  div  Usergroups  div  Register  div  Log in 
back to coppercoins home
Username:    Password:      Log me on automatically each visit    
coppercoins.com Forum Index arrow New Finds - Die Varieties and Varieties arrow 1960-D

1960-D
Post new topic   Reply to topic
Author Message

D42
Advanced Member
Advanced Member

Posts: 108
Joined: 09 Jan 2008
PostPosted: Sun Apr 12, 2009 3:54 pm Reply with quote

Does this look like it might be a small date over large date 1960-D
I can’t tell for sure. Someone plated this coin and the plating is flaking off in spots.
If it is a small over large date is there a way to remove the plating

Drew


[img][/img]
View user's profile Send private message

Bob P
Site Admin
Site Admin

Posts: 3482
Joined: 01 Jul 2003
Location: Niceville, Florida
PostPosted: Sun Apr 12, 2009 4:19 pm Reply with quote

Corrosion that is that severe really makes it a moot point if the coin is a variety or not, and it makes it just about impossible to tell for sure. There is no way to reverse the damage done at this point. Sorry....
_________________
Bob Piazza
Site Admin/Moderator
Attributer/Photographer
bobp@coppercoins.com
mustbebob1@gmail.com
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

eagames
Expert Member
Expert Member

Posts: 3013
Joined: 15 Nov 2005
PostPosted: Sun Apr 12, 2009 4:24 pm Reply with quote

I see why you think so but I think the plating or whatever is on it is helping it to look that way.

On the SD over LD the top of the D is about in line with the tail of the 9. On your coin the D location looks similar but slightly lower which would rule it out from being that variety.

The plating or coating looks like it's peeling off, I'd try boiling a cup of water in the microwave then dropping the coin in a cup of icewater then into the boiling water. Do it a few times. The fast temp change might loosen the stuff and help some peel off. Give it a closer look after that.

Smile

_________________
Ed
View user's profile Send private message

coppercoins
Site Admin
Site Admin

Posts: 2809
Joined: 29 Jun 2003
Location: Springfield, Missouri.
PostPosted: Sun Apr 12, 2009 5:07 pm Reply with quote

Whatever it is, it certainly looks like it would have potential if the contaminants were carefully and successfully removed. It does not match the profile of the 1960D sm/lg date though. It looks more like a strong class 6 doubled die of some sort.

I do agree with Bob on this, though...if the contaminants cannot be successfully and completely removed, the coin is pretty much damaged beyond being listable as anything.

This is one good lesson as to why I do not bother looking through damaged coins. It's just a personal preference, but I would never want to find anything really good that I just had to send back to circulation because it's not in a collectible grade. I weed out damaged coins before they go under the scope.

_________________
C. D. Daughtrey
owner, developer
www.coppercoins.com
cd@coppercoins.com
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger

D42
Advanced Member
Advanced Member

Posts: 108
Joined: 09 Jan 2008
PostPosted: Mon Apr 13, 2009 9:33 am Reply with quote

I’ll try putting it in the freezer tonight and drop it in boiling water in the morning.
I will try it over several days.
I’ll also take before and after pictures just in case it works.

I do have a 1942 that was coated or plated it looks a lot like a 1943 cent in color
When I find it I will post it under this thread.

Drew
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic
Page 1 of 1
coppercoins.com Forum Index arrow New Finds - Die Varieties and Varieties arrow 1960-D




coppercoins.com © 2001-2005 All times are GMT - 6 Hours