| Author |
Message |
 JackVeteran Member
Posts: 203
Joined: 06 Jul 2003
Location: Apopka, Florida
|
|
 Posted: Sun Nov 28, 2004 9:23 pm |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 JRoccoVeteran Member
Posts: 418
Joined: 08 Oct 2004
|
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 28, 2004 11:08 pm |
|
|
|
Hi Jack, I will let the experts answer on this one because there are soo many D/D varieties on the 60 LD, I would be guessing. Your pics do show nice split serifs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
 coppercoinsSite Admin
Posts: 2809
Joined: 29 Jun 2003
Location: Springfield, Missouri.
|
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 29, 2004 12:05 am |
|
|
Hi Jack...Most likely #40, but could be #29 or #32. Too close to call without marker information.
_________________
C. D. Daughtrey
owner, developer
www.coppercoins.com
cd@coppercoins.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
JackVeteran Member
Posts: 203
Joined: 06 Jul 2003
Location: Apopka, Florida
|
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 29, 2004 9:13 am |
|
|
|
I have added the markers I could find on the 1960D unknown to the site shown and it looks like one of the markers on the reverse is the same as 29, however 29 is listed as D/D. With the split serif and the vertical bar and east hook make this a D/D/D. None of the markers on 40 were were on this coin.
|
|
|
|
|
|
coppercoinsSite Admin
Posts: 2809
Joined: 29 Jun 2003
Location: Springfield, Missouri.
|
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 29, 2004 6:31 pm |
|
|
CONECA has been wrong a number of times in missing minor split serifs on RPMs...it wouldn't surprise me if they were wrong this time too. Looks like it's probably #29, but on ones like that I simply cannot tell by photographs.
_________________
C. D. Daughtrey
owner, developer
www.coppercoins.com
cd@coppercoins.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
