1990D, incuse trails ?
|
  |
| Author |
Message |
 MorgansRmineAdvanced Member
Posts: 132
Joined: 12 Apr 2009
Location: Raleigh, North Carolina
|
|
 Posted: Mon Jul 06, 2009 7:42 am |
 |
|
Went back to work Dick and found this. At first I thought it was just ripples in the copper layer. Under the scope, I'm not so sure.
Same pics just higher up to show the fields.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 DickExpert Member
Posts: 5780
Joined: 21 Sep 2006
Location: Rialto, CA.
|
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 06, 2009 1:01 pm |
|
|
You are correct. Not trails. The thing i use for making sure which is which: Trails always seem to originate from a point, as in the sharp corner of a device. i may be in error, but that is how I search for them. hope this helps,
Dick
_________________
" Deja Moo: The feeling that you've heard this bull before".
|
|
|
|
|
|
wavysteps2003Expert Member
Posts: 1344
Joined: 25 Feb 2005
|
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 07, 2009 2:19 pm |
|
|
I am fairly sure that these are not trails, even though a working hub affected with trails would look like this.
BJ Neff
_________________
Member of: Coppercoins, ANA, CFCC (VP), CONECA, FUN, NCADD (Editor), NLG, LCR, traildies.com. and MADdieclashes.com
The opinions that I express do not necessarily reflect the policies of the organizations that I am a member of.
|
|
|
|
|
|
DickExpert Member
Posts: 5780
Joined: 21 Sep 2006
Location: Rialto, CA.
|
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 07, 2009 2:28 pm |
|
|
BJ, Am I ciorrect in saying that, given the working hub WAS affected by, or with trails, wouldn't the same theory apply? That is, the trails originate at points, and in the case of a hub being affected, they would be "incuse," on the coin. Correct?
Dick
_________________
" Deja Moo: The feeling that you've heard this bull before".
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Page 1 of 1 |
|
|
