coppercoins.com
 
Index div  FAQ  div  Search  div  Memberlist  div  Usergroups  div  Register  div  Log in 
back to coppercoins home
Username:    Password:      Log me on automatically each visit    
coppercoins.com Forum Index arrow General Discussion - Error Coins arrow 2008P with deep furrow.

2008P with deep furrow.
Post new topic   Reply to topic
Author Message

MorgansRmine
Advanced Member
Advanced Member

Posts: 132
Joined: 12 Apr 2009
Location: Raleigh, North Carolina
PostPosted: Wed Oct 21, 2009 11:53 am Reply with quote

Hard to make this show as a furrow. In the pictures it appears as being raised.



Two questions on this. There appears to be no breaks in the copper plating. Is the copper plating on the coin thick enough to stretch this much if the coin was struck through scrap?

Next. If this damage was on the zinc blank or planchet prior to the copper plating being applied, is there enough striking pressure to cause this void to be filled? When you consider the size of Lincolns profile, there has to be quite a bit of metal movement during the striking process.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger

Dick
Expert Member
Expert Member

Posts: 5780
Joined: 21 Sep 2006
Location: Rialto, CA.
PostPosted: Wed Oct 21, 2009 4:30 pm Reply with quote

Can't tell much from the small shots. A full-face view would give more info, to work with.
Dick

_________________
" Deja Moo: The feeling that you've heard this bull before".
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

eagames
Expert Member
Expert Member

Posts: 3013
Joined: 15 Nov 2005
PostPosted: Wed Oct 21, 2009 7:29 pm Reply with quote

Yes a full shot might help.

I don't think it was a planchet defect. Unless the full shot shows something else I doubt it was PM damage. Sometimes the copper can smear with PM damage but on this one from the pic I'm thinking it isn't damage, it was probably struck through something.

Smile

_________________
Ed
View user's profile Send private message

MorgansRmine
Advanced Member
Advanced Member

Posts: 132
Joined: 12 Apr 2009
Location: Raleigh, North Carolina
PostPosted: Thu Oct 22, 2009 9:22 am Reply with quote

Here's a pic showing more of the coin. I'm convinced this is a strike through, but don't understand how the copper layer is not split as I've seen on much smaller strike throughs.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger

Dick
Expert Member
Expert Member

Posts: 5780
Joined: 21 Sep 2006
Location: Rialto, CA.
PostPosted: Thu Oct 22, 2009 11:14 am Reply with quote

With the larger picture, my guess would be damage to the planchet, or even prior. you can see the undulating form in the bottom of the gouge. I believe it was plated that way. Now the fgorce of the strike would cause metal flow, but i don't see any indication. Of course, I'm not that experienced to give an educated guess. It doesn't look like the typical contact mark. It is not a fragmentation, indentation, as far as I can see. I took it to huge size, and still no sure answer. Struck-thru, or planchet damage, is the best I can think of.
Dick

_________________
" Deja Moo: The feeling that you've heard this bull before".
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

eagames
Expert Member
Expert Member

Posts: 3013
Joined: 15 Nov 2005
PostPosted: Thu Oct 22, 2009 11:45 am Reply with quote

After seeing the full pic I'm not sure.
It sort of looks like a roll crimper mark, it's in the right location for it.

If you see any slightly raised area along the edge of it then it probably is a mark from a crimper.

If there is no raised metal pushed up along the edge of it then I'd think struck through.

Smile

_________________
Ed
View user's profile Send private message

Dick
Expert Member
Expert Member

Posts: 5780
Joined: 21 Sep 2006
Location: Rialto, CA.
PostPosted: Thu Oct 22, 2009 10:25 pm Reply with quote

I hadn't considered the crimper damage, but it is very likely a, or the cause. I would expect to see some zinc, peering thru the damaged area. I don't think it happens every time, so antything is likely.
Dick

_________________
" Deja Moo: The feeling that you've heard this bull before".
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

wavysteps2003
Expert Member
Expert Member

Posts: 1344
Joined: 25 Feb 2005
PostPosted: Tue Dec 22, 2009 7:51 am Reply with quote

It is a strike through. Most planchet damage does not survive the striking process because of cold metal flow, unles it is a majoe defect.

BJ Neff

_________________
Member of: Coppercoins, ANA, CFCC (VP), CONECA, FUN, NCADD (Editor), NLG, LCR, traildies.com. and MADdieclashes.com

The opinions that I express do not necessarily reflect the policies of the organizations that I am a member of.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

coppercoins
Site Admin
Site Admin

Posts: 2809
Joined: 29 Jun 2003
Location: Springfield, Missouri.
PostPosted: Tue Dec 22, 2009 8:19 am Reply with quote

A matter of semantics, but might as well be correct, eh? It's "struck-through" - not "strike through". The coin was struck...past tense. It isn't still striking.

This is not a crimper mark. It's not circular (exactly) and doesn't show any of the dug trench scrape marks common with a roll crimper. Furthermore, there are no marks anywhere else on the coin. VERY odd for a crimper.

This is a struck-through, probably metal scrap. It's actually worth a premium because the struck-through area is easily large enough to see from at least arm's length. Very nice!

_________________
C. D. Daughtrey
owner, developer
www.coppercoins.com
cd@coppercoins.com
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic
Page 1 of 1
coppercoins.com Forum Index arrow General Discussion - Error Coins arrow 2008P with deep furrow.




coppercoins.com © 2001-2005 All times are GMT - 6 Hours