| Author |
Message |
MorganmanicNew Member
Posts: 13
Joined: 16 Aug 2011
|
|
 Posted: Fri Jan 13, 2012 5:04 pm |
 |
|
I think this is the above mentioned die variety I have taken the pics as they are laid out in the search feature. I believe because of the coins low grade some of the markers are not seen but I think there are enough to identify it as the variety. What do you all say?
http://s151.photobucket.com/albums/s150/morganmanic/1964-1DR-010/
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 coopExpert Member
Posts: 3402
Joined: 17 Sep 2003
Location: Arizona
|
|
| Posted: Fri Jan 13, 2012 8:56 pm |
|
|
I don't seen any signs of a doubled die? Markers don't prove much if there is no doubled die.
_________________
Richard S. Cooper
You may be only one person in the world, but you may also be the world to one person.
|
|
|
|
|
|
 GarryNExpert Member
Posts: 1296
Joined: 09 Jul 2003
Location: Chicago
|
|
| Posted: Mon Jan 16, 2012 8:47 am |
|
|
|
The description of 1DR 10 in the date guide talks about a wide spread on the outer devices and shows a picture of spread at the bottom of ONE.
|
|
|
|
|
|
 coppercoinsSite Admin
Posts: 2809
Joined: 29 Jun 2003
Location: Springfield, Missouri.
|
|
| Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2012 5:55 am |
|
|
I highly doubt the coin imaged is a doubled die at all. The lighting is way off in the images, but in the couple of places where I can see something that might look like doubling, and gauging from where the arrows are pointing in the remaining images, I believe what the owner of this coin is seeing would be machine doubling and nothing else.
It definitely is not 1964P-1DR-010
_________________
C. D. Daughtrey
owner, developer
www.coppercoins.com
cd@coppercoins.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
