| Author |
Message |
eagamesExpert Member
Posts: 3013 Joined: 15 Nov 2005
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 25, 2006 4:31 pm |
|
|
A while back I found 2 nice unc 49-s which I thought were the ddo die-1. I sent one to ANACs and they sent it back without the attrib saying not the requested variety I thought they must be wrong since at that time I thought there's just the one blunt over pointed 4 ddo for the year. (I think it was the only one listed here then) Recently I was looking on the site and saw there's 2 blunt over pointed 4 varieties listed and ones also an rpm but that one is not die 1 I looked and realized I had one of each and the one I had sent in was the one with the rpm so ANACs was right since that one is not die 1. So I can chalk it up as another mystery solved by this site!
Does anyone know if the second one 1D0-002/1MM-013 was recently added to this site?
_________________ Ed
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Bob PSite Admin
Posts: 3482 Joined: 01 Jul 2003 Location: Niceville, Florida
|
|
Posted: Sat Aug 26, 2006 6:11 am |
|
|
Ed,
I discovered the new DDO/RPM combo in November of last year. I put out a thread in the forum asking folks to check their DDO # 001's to make sure they had that DDO, and not the one with the RPM. It turned out that there were about 6 or seven folks who found out theirs also contained an RPM. I added that die to the site in November 2005. As far as I know, we are the only ones to identify this second blunt 4 over pointed 4 doubled die and RPM combination.
_________________ Bob Piazza
Site Admin/Moderator
Attributer/Photographer
bobp@coppercoins.com
mustbebob1@gmail.com
|
|
|
|
|
 |
eagamesExpert Member
Posts: 3013 Joined: 15 Nov 2005
|
|
Posted: Sat Aug 26, 2006 1:43 pm |
|
|
Thanks bob,
That fits the timeframe, I must have looked just before you added the DDO/RPM combo.
I'm still amazed that Anacs figured out that the one I submitted was not the same as DDO-1, the timeframe was about right so they might have read your thread to know there were 2 types of blunt over pointed 4s.
_________________ Ed
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Bob PSite Admin
Posts: 3482 Joined: 01 Jul 2003 Location: Niceville, Florida
|
|
Posted: Sat Aug 26, 2006 6:15 pm |
|
|
It amazes me too Ed. Unless they immediately picked up on the RPM, there would have been no way for them to know it wasn't the same as DDO-001. The mintmark positioning is close but not exact, and the doubling is also. I know they don't spend a lot of time on each coin, so maybe markers were the determining factor??
_________________ Bob Piazza
Site Admin/Moderator
Attributer/Photographer
bobp@coppercoins.com
mustbebob1@gmail.com
|
|
|
|
|
 |
coppercoinsSite Admin
Posts: 2809 Joined: 29 Jun 2003 Location: Springfield, Missouri.
|
|
Posted: Mon Aug 28, 2006 7:24 am |
|
|
I find it odd that they would return the coin instead of holdering it with the proper number...I guess they don't do that??
_________________ C. D. Daughtrey
owner, developer
www.coppercoins.com
cd@coppercoins.com
|
|
|
|
|
 |
eagamesExpert Member
Posts: 3013 Joined: 15 Nov 2005
|
|
Posted: Mon Aug 28, 2006 10:00 pm |
|
|
I think the reason is when you submit to ANACs you can pay $10 for their attribution then they figure it out. In this case I didn't do that since I thought there was only one type of blunt over pointed 4 for the year.
Or you pay $5 for verification and you tell them the variety, if you are wrong they just holder with no attribution. On a few occasions they will say DDO but not which one. In this case they just holdered it with nothing but grade.
_________________ Ed
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|