| Author |
Message |
GabeSenior Member
Posts: 691
Joined: 11 Jul 2003
Location: Gainesville, FL
|
|
 Posted: Sun Jan 11, 2004 10:46 am |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 RobertSenior Member
Posts: 896
Joined: 05 Jul 2003
Location: Oklahoma
|
|
| Posted: Sun Jan 11, 2004 3:40 pm |
|
|
My uninformed opinion... this is minor. It's not what Bush is looking for.
For those who are "anti-Bush": How did Saddam gas the Kurds after the Gulf War if Iraq had no chem weapons? Do you *really* trust Saddam's word?
For those who are "pro-Bush": If Saddam's chem weapon program was so big, shouldn't we have found something by now?
|
|
|
|
|
|
 smedSenior Member
Posts: 624
Joined: 21 Oct 2003
Location: Zephyrhills Florida
|
|
| Posted: Sun Jan 11, 2004 5:33 pm |
|
|
An anti-Bush bleeding-heart left-wing facist liberal - Saddam really didn't do gas the Kurds or do any of that other mean stuff. He's misunderstood and it's all a Bush fabrication just like all Bush's reasons for going to war. (I don't believe any of that in the slightest, it's simply for comparison)
A pro-Bush conservative - if you mean his WMD program, we have already found something - the vans about 8 months ago. The libs ignored it.
For the record, the only "anti" I am is anti-liberal. I love it when libs call in to Hannity's radio program, yell and scream at him and refuse to answer his questions even when they're asked 3 and 4 times. For some reason they feel that spouting vaguities proves all their moronic arguments.
_________________
Life Member American Numismatic Association (ANA), Pensacola Numismatic Society
Life Member American Veterans (AmVets), Veterans of Foreign Wars (VFW), Fleet Reserve Association (FRA)
Member Loyal Order of Moose
Member American Legion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
