| Author |
Message |
jstraw13Member
Posts: 96
Joined: 16 Feb 2008
Location: New Jersey
|
|
 Posted: Sat Jun 21, 2008 9:20 am |
 |
|
What do you think these might grade?
     
Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 DickExpert Member
Posts: 5780
Joined: 21 Sep 2006
Location: Rialto, CA.
|
|
| Posted: Sat Jun 21, 2008 3:20 pm |
|
|
jstraw13, this is my first attempt to "grade" a Morgan. If it is "ball-park", great. If it is over or under, then let it be known that no offense was intended, or inferred. Just a wild guess.
Now I commit myself:
#1. EF-40/AU-45
#2. VF-30/EF-40
#3. F-20/EF-45
I know there are many who can give a better asnwer.......Let the rocks fly!
Dick
_________________
" Deja Moo: The feeling that you've heard this bull before".
|
|
|
|
|
|
jstraw13Member
Posts: 96
Joined: 16 Feb 2008
Location: New Jersey
|
|
| Posted: Sat Jun 21, 2008 4:19 pm |
|
|
|
No offense taken, Dick. I appreciate your honest opinion! Thank you
|
|
|
|
|
|
 coppercoinsSite Admin
Posts: 2809
Joined: 29 Jun 2003
Location: Springfield, Missouri.
|
|
| Posted: Sat Jun 21, 2008 5:21 pm |
|
|
All three appear to have been cleaned, but just in case it's the lighting only, then:
AU50
VF20
EF40
_________________
C. D. Daughtrey
owner, developer
www.coppercoins.com
cd@coppercoins.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
 GarryNExpert Member
Posts: 1296
Joined: 09 Jul 2003
Location: Chicago
|
|
| Posted: Sun Jun 22, 2008 5:46 am |
|
|
|
I thought I replied to this one. My thought was similar, its not easy to grade based on a photo, but I thought that assuming the coins were not cleaned or whizzed, the two 1893-O were at AU and the 1893-CC at F-12.
|
|
|
|
|
|
jstraw13Member
Posts: 96
Joined: 16 Feb 2008
Location: New Jersey
|
|
| Posted: Sun Jun 22, 2008 7:17 am |
|
|
|
Thanks guys. Sorry the pics were a little dark. To my knowledge the coins have not been cleaned, though I have my doubts about the 1893 O. Still a good set to hold on to in my opinoin.
|
|
|
|
|
|
GarryNExpert Member
Posts: 1296
Joined: 09 Jul 2003
Location: Chicago
|
|
| Posted: Sun Jun 22, 2008 7:28 am |
|
|
|
My mistake, one is a '93-P. I agree, all three are very scarce coins. And the details on the '93-P and '93-O are sharp regardless. Anyone would love to have any of them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
