coppercoins.com
 
Index div  FAQ  div  Search  div  Memberlist  div  Usergroups  div  Register  div  Log in 
back to coppercoins home
Username:    Password:      Log me on automatically each visit    
coppercoins.com Forum Index arrow Questions about Die Varieties arrow 2003 DDR cents?

2003 DDR cents?
Post new topic   Reply to topic
Author Message

Robert
Senior Member
Senior Member

Posts: 896
Joined: 05 Jul 2003
Location: Oklahoma
PostPosted: Sat May 08, 2004 7:06 am Reply with quote

Chuck, could you shed some more light on "wavy step" Lincolns? I'm going to transcribe a portion of an article from the May 10 Coin World, p. 82.

"Wexler presents photos of additional die diagnostics for four 2003 Philadelphia Mint Lincoln cents that (Wexler) has listed as doubled die reverses 3 through 6, from a doubled working hub. The coins have been subject of several Coin World articles."

"The Mint has denied that they, and the 'stronger' dies 1 and 2, which appear to show extensions of columns downward into the steps, are true doubled dies. A Mint assistant director's responses to several questions regarding them, and differences raised by (other specialists) were carried in the March 29 issue of CW."

"'Wavy steps' on the Lincoln Memorial are typical of dies 3 through 6. Wexler's photos in The Hub also show scratches and gouges that serve as additional 'die markers'".

"Wexler writes that reports of similar dies from other years are being explored. These include 1993 (two dies), 1995, 1997, 1999 (two), and 2001. A 2003 with doubled die obverse is also reported, he writes."


So the Mint says they're not doubled dies, but Wexler says they are. Are they both wrong?
View user's profile Send private message

smed
Senior Member
Senior Member

Posts: 624
Joined: 21 Oct 2003
Location: Zephyrhills Florida
PostPosted: Sat May 08, 2004 6:27 pm Reply with quote

My personal opinion from the pictures I've seen is either they are doubled dies or they were minted from a defective die. There's no way I can accept plachet graininess for a reason. I don't buy the mint's explaination at all.
_________________
Life Member American Numismatic Association (ANA), Pensacola Numismatic Society
Life Member American Veterans (AmVets), Veterans of Foreign Wars (VFW), Fleet Reserve Association (FRA)
Member Loyal Order of Moose
Member American Legion
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

coppercoins
Site Admin
Site Admin

Posts: 2809
Joined: 29 Jun 2003
Location: Springfield, Missouri.
PostPosted: Thu May 20, 2004 11:46 am Reply with quote

The consensus is that these are a new form of doubled die caused when the die "snaps" into position while being hubbed under enormous pressure to transfer the whole design in a single hubbing. The snap motion while pressure is applied "drags" the design over a part of the die causing the slightly indistinct nature of the doubling. It is NOT machine doubling because the oddity in the design is on the die and is not a result of the striking process.

That's about all I really have to offer right now. I need to study some of these coins in further detail before getting into a more detailed explanation.

_________________
C. D. Daughtrey
owner, developer
www.coppercoins.com
cd@coppercoins.com
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic
Page 1 of 1
coppercoins.com Forum Index arrow Questions about Die Varieties arrow 2003 DDR cents?




coppercoins.com © 2001-2005 All times are GMT - 6 Hours