| Author |
Message |
coppercoinsSite Admin
Posts: 2809 Joined: 29 Jun 2003 Location: Springfield, Missouri.
|
|
Posted: Tue Feb 17, 2009 4:51 pm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
RobertSenior Member
Posts: 896 Joined: 05 Jul 2003 Location: Oklahoma
|
|
Posted: Tue Feb 17, 2009 7:54 pm |
|
|
Well I was wrong!
|
|
|
|
|
 |
eagamesExpert Member
Posts: 3013 Joined: 15 Nov 2005
|
|
Posted: Tue Feb 17, 2009 9:23 pm |
|
|
Do the fields on the reverse look bumpy?
_________________ Ed
|
|
|
|
|
 |
DickExpert Member
Posts: 5780 Joined: 21 Sep 2006 Location: Rialto, CA.
|
|
Posted: Wed Feb 18, 2009 11:54 am |
|
|
Ed, do you mean, like a sand cast? That was what I thoufht at first. Then I decided it was not a cast. I thought it was a '41-S, which was altered. NOT!
Dick
_________________ " Deja Moo: The feeling that you've heard this bull before".
|
|
|
|
|
 |
GabeSenior Member
Posts: 691 Joined: 11 Jul 2003 Location: Gainesville, FL
|
|
Posted: Wed Feb 18, 2009 1:33 pm |
|
|
Lol.. I was right!
_________________ -Gabe
|
|
|
|
|
 |
coopExpert Member
Posts: 3402 Joined: 17 Sep 2003 Location: Arizona
|
|
Posted: Wed Feb 18, 2009 5:20 pm |
|
|
It looks like an early 70's design instead of a 11.
_________________ Richard S. Cooper
You may be only one person in the world, but you may also be the world to one person.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
DickExpert Member
Posts: 5780 Joined: 21 Sep 2006 Location: Rialto, CA.
|
|
Posted: Wed Feb 18, 2009 7:05 pm |
|
|
Coop, you have me confused! How could the design be "an early '70's"? The profile looks like it is okay, and the wheat was not a '70's rev. Is there that much difference in the profile(s)? I did think it was a very well struck coin, and indicated as such.
Dick
_________________ " Deja Moo: The feeling that you've heard this bull before".
|
|
|
|
|
 |
DickExpert Member
Posts: 5780 Joined: 21 Sep 2006 Location: Rialto, CA.
|
|
Posted: Wed Feb 18, 2009 7:08 pm |
|
|
Don't feel bad, Robert, I was too! And very surprised at what I found out.
Dick
_________________ " Deja Moo: The feeling that you've heard this bull before".
|
|
|
|
|
 |
eagamesExpert Member
Posts: 3013 Joined: 15 Nov 2005
|
|
Posted: Wed Feb 18, 2009 7:59 pm |
|
|
Most fakes have "not quite right" portraits for the year.
I see what Coop mean't, this portrait looks more like a 1970s. If it was a 1972 it might look right
_________________ Ed
|
|
|
|
|
 |
DickExpert Member
Posts: 5780 Joined: 21 Sep 2006 Location: Rialto, CA.
|
|
Posted: Wed Feb 18, 2009 9:00 pm |
|
|
ED, I was going to compare the profile of this "coin", with one on the 70's-S, and check the profile, but couldn't find any full face pgotos.
Dick
_________________ " Deja Moo: The feeling that you've heard this bull before".
|
|
|
|
|
 |
cladkingMember
Posts: 94 Joined: 04 Jul 2003
|
|
Posted: Thu Feb 19, 2009 11:16 pm |
|
|
Anyone who misses this one by much shouldn't consider getting into dealing.
_________________ Tempus fugit.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
DickExpert Member
Posts: 5780 Joined: 21 Sep 2006 Location: Rialto, CA.
|
|
Posted: Fri Feb 20, 2009 12:19 am |
|
|
cladking, I'll keep that in mind! I have never sold a coin, and like as not, never will. At least not in this lifetime!
Dick
_________________ " Deja Moo: The feeling that you've heard this bull before".
|
|
|
|
|
 |
daviscfadAdvanced Member
Posts: 122 Joined: 09 Feb 2009 Location: RR, NC
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 22, 2009 1:01 am |
|
|
I am missing it what was the dead giveaway of it being a fake??
_________________ inquiring minds want to know
|
|
|
|
|
 |
coppercoinsSite Admin
Posts: 2809 Joined: 29 Jun 2003 Location: Springfield, Missouri.
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 22, 2009 1:20 am |
|
|
See all the 'bubbles' on the reverse? This is a sign of a fake die, probably spark erosion. Second thing is the shape of the mintmark - way off what it should look like. The next thing is that the portrait itself is a lot softer than it ever was in 1911. The shape and size of the date digits are wrong...it's also too sharp.
Basically the obverse of this coin was struck with a hand cut and tooled die. The reverse was struck with a die made by a crude 'copy' technique using electricity.
The surface of this coin on the obverse is prooflike, and the reverse is very mottled.
All these things together make this coin look just 'wrong'. Very few experienced Lincoln cent people would ever be fooled by this work of art.
_________________ C. D. Daughtrey
owner, developer
www.coppercoins.com
cd@coppercoins.com
|
|
|
|
|
 |
daviscfadAdvanced Member
Posts: 122 Joined: 09 Feb 2009 Location: RR, NC
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 22, 2009 10:57 am |
|
|
Thanks for the reply coppercoins... I have a lot to learn about Lincoln Cents
_________________ inquiring minds want to know
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|