| Author |
Message |
MorgansRmineAdvanced Member
Posts: 132 Joined: 12 Apr 2009 Location: Raleigh, North Carolina
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2009 8:18 am |
|
|
On column 6, by the hand and on column 7, ajacent to the pedistal there is doubling of the columns at quite an angle. Also on column 7 there is a straight bar ajacent to the column. With all the intricate design on the building, above the pillars, and the steps and shrubs, why is there no further evidence that the die was set at an angle and snapped back at the time of hubbing?
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Bob PSite Admin
Posts: 3482 Joined: 01 Jul 2003 Location: Niceville, Florida
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2009 6:38 pm |
|
|
You have to remember that the die is conical in shape. When the hub is initially being lowered to make the die, the center portion is the first part to touch the very tip of the die. This one may not have had a 'snap back'. It is possible the hub may have made an initial kiss, and then raised after an alignment problem was noted. once everything was reset, the normal hubbing process may have been completed. This could explain the radical angle of the doubling.
_________________ Bob Piazza
Site Admin/Moderator
Attributer/Photographer
bobp@coppercoins.com
mustbebob1@gmail.com
|
|
|
|
|
 |
MorgansRmineAdvanced Member
Posts: 132 Joined: 12 Apr 2009 Location: Raleigh, North Carolina
|
|
Posted: Fri Nov 20, 2009 4:55 am |
|
|
|
Thanks Bob. I would guess there is no way of telling which was out of allignment, the hub or the die? Also, the kiss would explain part of the doubling. Was there a separate minor snap to back to cause the straight bar on column 7? Or can you get two different angles of doubling at the same time?
|
|
|
|
|
 |
coopExpert Member
Posts: 3402 Joined: 17 Sep 2003 Location: Arizona
|
|
Posted: Fri Nov 20, 2009 1:43 pm |
|
|
Looks like the die was hub doubled to me. Nice find. I've not seen that one before.
_________________ Richard S. Cooper
You may be only one person in the world, but you may also be the world to one person.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|