| Author |
Message |
daviscfadAdvanced Member
Posts: 122 Joined: 09 Feb 2009 Location: RR, NC
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 10, 2010 9:23 pm |
|
|
can someone help me get a value on these 2 1999s Proof Close AM.. Thanks
_________________ inquiring minds want to know
|
|
|
|
|
 |
eagamesExpert Member
Posts: 3013 Joined: 15 Nov 2005
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 11, 2010 8:38 pm |
|
|
I would search closed ebay auctions.
Just be sure to compare with other NGC graded ones at the same grade.
_________________ Ed
|
|
|
|
|
 |
daviscfadAdvanced Member
Posts: 122 Joined: 09 Feb 2009 Location: RR, NC
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 11, 2010 10:06 pm |
|
|
thanks eagames. I had checked but i only saw a couple and they were pf-67 and not sold. I got both for 55 at the FUN show
_________________ inquiring minds want to know
|
|
|
|
|
 |
eagamesExpert Member
Posts: 3013 Joined: 15 Nov 2005
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 11, 2010 11:49 pm |
|
|
I think $55 was a bargain.
The grading fee included means you got them for a steal.
(my opinion LOL)
I have an NGC 1999-s CLOSE AM PF 67 RD ULTRA CAMEO and I think I also got it for a bargain but it was more than you paid for your 68 & 69.
I think the market for many varieties is low now days, a few years ago many coins were 2-3 times todays price. I guess it's good if you're buying and not good if selling
_________________ Ed
|
|
|
|
|
 |
GarryNExpert Member
Posts: 1296 Joined: 09 Jul 2003 Location: Chicago
|
|
Posted: Tue Jan 12, 2010 8:36 am |
|
|
|
Isn't the Close AM reverse the common reverse used on proofs, or am I mistaken?
|
|
|
|
|
 |
daviscfadAdvanced Member
Posts: 122 Joined: 09 Feb 2009 Location: RR, NC
|
|
Posted: Tue Jan 12, 2010 9:30 am |
|
|
On the proofs its supposed to be Wide and on the business strikes its close supposed to be Close. So When you find a Wide AM Business Strike its worth more and when you find A Close AM proof its worth more. Well I saw them and I asked the guy how much for your 99-s Close AM. He said I dont know They market for around 100 bucks so if i can get my grading fee out of them i will be happy. He said give me 30 bucks and i am cool. He's like i find them and send them in so I just want my fee back. Well then i said what will you take for both of them and he said 55. I said sold
_________________ inquiring minds want to know
|
|
|
|
|
 |
GarryNExpert Member
Posts: 1296 Joined: 09 Jul 2003 Location: Chicago
|
|
Posted: Tue Jan 12, 2010 12:24 pm |
|
|
Thanks, I thought I was confused on that. I have a 1998 Wide AM in a PCGS holder. I forget what the grade is. At least 65. Once I tried to trade it in with some others for a coin at one of my local B&M shops and the dealer didnt know what it was and would not take it.
Last edited by GarryN on Wed Jan 13, 2010 10:20 am; edited 1 time in total
|
|
|
|
|
 |
coppercoinsSite Admin
Posts: 2809 Joined: 29 Jun 2003 Location: Springfield, Missouri.
|
|
Posted: Tue Jan 12, 2010 12:41 pm |
|
|
Remember Garry that this is the proof issue. NORMAL for the proof is wide-AM and NORMAL for the business strike is the close-AM. The variety coins have the reverse types switched.
My best guess at values for the close-AM 1999S proof cent are:
PR66 - $30
PR67 - $50
PR68 - $100
PR69 - $200
PR70 - $350
The values are more or less guesses and should be taken as such. I found very little regarding sales history on them, and the highest grade values are formed from a baseline of average multipliers of other modern issues from one grade to the next.
Most of the history I have with this issue is full set sales, which have been 2 to 4 times the value of a normal set.
The 1998S issue is FAR less common and much more valuable.
I have sold two of the 1999S sets for $250 and $300, and purchased one of the 1998S sets for $1,200.
_________________ C. D. Daughtrey
owner, developer
www.coppercoins.com
cd@coppercoins.com
|
|
|
|
|
 |
GarryNExpert Member
Posts: 1296 Joined: 09 Jul 2003 Location: Chicago
|
|
Posted: Tue Jan 12, 2010 2:22 pm |
|
|
|
Daviscfd's dealer left alot of money on the table! Thats almost equivalent to a cherrypick. The only thing to worry about is that the coins won't turn bad in the holder.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|