1928s 1mm-001?

[ken]

Not sure about this one.Any ideas.What's the difference between large ans small mm for this date?

[DoubleYou]

http://www.varietyvista.com/San%20Francisco%20Mintmark%20Styles.htm

The above gives all the mintmark styles. Yours is the small mintmark, so it can't be 1MM-001.

_______________
Wendell Carper

http://numismatically.weebly.com

[ken]

Hi Wendell,Thank you for the excellent link on the mm's.Going by the link,I compared the 2 styles and the large mm has more of an oval space on the curves as to a more rounded style for the small mm in addition to the elongated serifs.I think this may be the large s mm.Maybe someone else will comment on this to clarify 1 way or the other.

[eagames]

I think it's the small style.

I'm not 100% certain but look at the center section, on the large one it's different. Let's see if anyone else has an opinion.

[coppercoins]

Well, it's not an opinion...but the coin photographed in this thread is a small mintmark. The style of font used in the large mintmark is much different.

[ken]

Thank you Chuck.That definitely clears it up.Do you think is is an rpm?You can see a 2nd mm north of the 1st.

[coppercoins]

I do not see it in that image, but it could very well just be the image. I would need to either see the coin or a much better lit and focused image of the mintmark to tell for sure.