| Author |
Message |
DanesterAdvanced Member
Posts: 176 Joined: 18 Aug 2005 Location: Las Vegas, NV
|
|
Posted: Fri Mar 25, 2011 3:15 am |
|
|
I found this one in a bag about 8-years ago. From my image one could argue it is not a D/D, but a die gouge (I use a scanner and can't control the light). However, when I use my Loupe under a good light and come in from different directions it sure looks like the remains of the left side of a wide punched "D" - serif at the bottom and a titled bar of the "D" going up to the lower tip of the "9". If this is a D/D wide repunch, then they probably caught if fairly soon and retired the obverse die limiting the number of pieces. "What say you"?
_________________ The Danester
"Research is what I do when I don't know what I doing" - Wernher Von Braun
|
|
|
|
|
 |
wavysteps2003Expert Member
Posts: 1344 Joined: 25 Feb 2005
|
|
Posted: Fri Mar 25, 2011 7:07 am |
|
|
It appears to be a slight lamination problem that you are look at and not a wide repunched mint mark.
BJ Neff
_________________ Member of: Coppercoins, ANA, CFCC (VP), CONECA, FUN, NCADD (Editor), NLG, LCR, traildies.com. and MADdieclashes.com
The opinions that I express do not necessarily reflect the policies of the organizations that I am a member of.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
DanesterAdvanced Member
Posts: 176 Joined: 18 Aug 2005 Location: Las Vegas, NV
|
|
Posted: Fri Mar 25, 2011 11:37 am |
|
|
The area is struck-up, so a planchet lamination is not what we are seeing. It is either a wide MM punch or a die gouge. It's like the face on Mars - looks too man-made.
_________________ The Danester
"Research is what I do when I don't know what I doing" - Wernher Von Braun
|
|
|
|
|
 |
DickExpert Member
Posts: 5780 Joined: 21 Sep 2006 Location: Rialto, CA.
|
|
Posted: Fri Mar 25, 2011 11:56 am |
|
|
The MM was hand punched, then, so i wonder if it might have been "Monday", after a rough weekend....?
_________________ " Deja Moo: The feeling that you've heard this bull before".
|
|
|
|
|
 |
wavysteps2003Expert Member
Posts: 1344 Joined: 25 Feb 2005
|
|
Posted: Fri Mar 25, 2011 3:23 pm |
|
|
And because it is above the field, you discount lamination? I just zoomed in your picture that you posted and I still believe that it is a lamination peel with probably debris under it.
BJ Neff
_________________ Member of: Coppercoins, ANA, CFCC (VP), CONECA, FUN, NCADD (Editor), NLG, LCR, traildies.com. and MADdieclashes.com
The opinions that I express do not necessarily reflect the policies of the organizations that I am a member of.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
eagamesExpert Member
Posts: 3013 Joined: 15 Nov 2005
|
|
Posted: Fri Mar 25, 2011 3:40 pm |
|
|
It looks like a die chip blob or a lifted lamination.
_________________ Ed
|
|
|
|
|
 |
DanesterAdvanced Member
Posts: 176 Joined: 18 Aug 2005 Location: Las Vegas, NV
|
|
Posted: Fri Mar 25, 2011 10:47 pm |
|
|
OK, I went out today and bought a replacement light for my 30x Microscope that I purchased from Bill Fivaz about 20-years ago. I was trying to use a 7x loupe and my scanner to find out what was going on with this coin. Sorry for the confusion
Anyway, I had a good look a it under 30x magnification and it is not a repunched MM, or a die chip/gouge. It looks to have been struck-though with 3 separate pieces of metal. #2 could be a lamination flap as pointed out, but looking at it from the left-of-date, it looks like a separate piece that merged well with the field to the right. #'s 1 & 2 definitely look like struck-through pieces of metal. Now I know what I have - struck-through and possibly some lamnation.
I need to buy a good microscope and new camera... what do you guy's now use - I need a few tips on this.
Thanks for all your input.
_________________ The Danester
"Research is what I do when I don't know what I doing" - Wernher Von Braun
|
|
|
|
|
 |
coppercoinsSite Admin
Posts: 2809 Joined: 29 Jun 2003 Location: Springfield, Missouri.
|
|
Posted: Sun Mar 27, 2011 10:59 am |
|
|
1. Die chip
2. Die crack.
3. Die crack continued.
That's what I see.
Die chips and cracks to the left of the mintmark seem common on 1950-1953 cents for some reason. There are plenty of them for 1952D.
_________________ C. D. Daughtrey
owner, developer
www.coppercoins.com
cd@coppercoins.com
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|