| Author |
Message |
pennyhoundVeteran Member
Posts: 414 Joined: 04 Aug 2004 Location: Central Texas
|
|
Posted: Wed Feb 09, 2005 10:24 am |
|
|
Didn't see a picture, (on site) so I assume we need to send this one in at sometime in the future.
Going thru a few rolls I picked up and found these two.
(appear to be the same RPM)
At any rate, which RPM is this one?
(1st 2 pictures are same coin, third one is of different coin.)
Top left serf is hit but this is the inside of it.
This is # 8 on site.
But #8, (on site photo) isn't as fat at bottom left? Maybe two new ones, titled ... ???
And we back to looking.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Bob PSite Admin
Posts: 3482 Joined: 01 Jul 2003 Location: Niceville, Florida
|
|
Posted: Thu Feb 10, 2005 1:15 pm |
|
|
Pennyhound, I would love to help you try and figure out which one this is, but I need you to do one thing when you take your photos. A primary marker for RPM's is their placement in respect to the date. If you can include a little bit of the date in your future pics, it would help out a great deal. Until then, I will see what I can do about trying to narrow this one down....OK??
_________________ Bob Piazza
Site Admin/Moderator
Attributer/Photographer
bobp@coppercoins.com
mustbebob1@gmail.com
|
|
|
|
|
 |
DougAdvanced Member
Posts: 110 Joined: 05 Jul 2003 Location: Illinois
|
|
Posted: Thu Feb 10, 2005 4:19 pm |
|
|
|
Bob said it very well as far as including the date on pictures of suspect rpms. Mint mark position is crucial albeit N,S,E,W on "typical" rpms but throw in the countless tilt/rotated candidates and things get all the more definative and brutally tough to call. Position (n,s,e,w or rotated) in relation to the date obviously gives a point to begin research. I respect tilt/rotated rpms but each and every one deserves individual inspection for "personal collectibility" according to the strength noted/seen. Jeeze, every rpm collector here could write volumes on the "too minor" classification when split serifs are concerned.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
pennyhoundVeteran Member
Posts: 414 Joined: 04 Aug 2004 Location: Central Texas
|
|
Posted: Thu Feb 10, 2005 11:13 pm |
|
|
Comen right up ... lol, I told ya befor ... I'm not that, into RPM's, now that I know ya need the Date, to help identify ... comen right up. (& who-ever said, "Ya can't teach old dogs new tricks" ... hehehe) I learn something darn near every time I visit this site.
If you need better, just ask. (did it really quick)
If ya need me to go out some-more, also just let me know.
(LoL, Bob, now I know ... get that date too ... will do.)
|
|
|
|
|
 |
pennyhoundVeteran Member
Posts: 414 Joined: 04 Aug 2004 Location: Central Texas
|
|
Posted: Fri Feb 11, 2005 12:19 am |
|
|
Less confussen this way ...
I think this one is different than the one above, but I could be wrong.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
coppercoinsSite Admin
Posts: 2809 Joined: 29 Jun 2003 Location: Springfield, Missouri.
|
|
Posted: Fri Feb 11, 2005 12:44 am |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
pennyhoundVeteran Member
Posts: 414 Joined: 04 Aug 2004 Location: Central Texas
|
|
Posted: Fri Feb 11, 2005 3:39 am |
|
|
Are they both the same RPM? Look at bottom serf, left side.
Also, would you like for me to send it in for pictures?
No picture for 15 listed.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Bob PSite Admin
Posts: 3482 Joined: 01 Jul 2003 Location: Niceville, Florida
|
|
Posted: Fri Feb 11, 2005 8:27 am |
|
|
It looks like # 15 to me also. We don't have that one on the site yet because we may not have it to photograph. It does look somewhat like the pic in the RPM book. Hold on to it for now and let me have a look to see if I have one to photograph...OK??
_________________ Bob Piazza
Site Admin/Moderator
Attributer/Photographer
bobp@coppercoins.com
mustbebob1@gmail.com
|
|
|
|
|
 |
pennyhoundVeteran Member
Posts: 414 Joined: 04 Aug 2004 Location: Central Texas
|
|
Posted: Fri Feb 11, 2005 7:34 pm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|