| Author |
Message |
murphySenior Member
Posts: 573 Joined: 02 Sep 2004 Location: New Albany, Indiana USA
|
|
Posted: Mon May 30, 2005 12:48 pm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
wavysteps2003Expert Member
Posts: 1344 Joined: 25 Feb 2005
|
|
Posted: Mon May 30, 2005 6:47 pm |
|
|
Hi Murph - Believe it or not, the 1993-S is the only proof with a closed AM that is NOT an error. In 1992, both the business strike and the proof coin were wide AMs, except for the 1992-D error that did produce a wide AM by mistake. In 1993, the mint went to the closed AM on both business and proof coins. In 1994, the mint went back to the wide AM for proof coins and the closed AM for the business strike. This remains true until 1998 when the wide AM is found on the business strike and just recently, the closed AM on proof coins. This also happened on the 1999 cent; a mix-up in dies for both the business and proof coins. Also the wide AM is found on the 2000 business strike. Hope this answers your question and good hunting.
BJ Neff
|
|
|
|
|
 |
murphySenior Member
Posts: 573 Joined: 02 Sep 2004 Location: New Albany, Indiana USA
|
|
Posted: Mon May 30, 2005 7:50 pm |
|
|
Thanks Wavy. I have found lots of 1998 and 2000 Wide Am's in searching circulated bank rolls, but they, the 1992-D and 1999 are all I knew about. When I saw my 1993-S, I forgot which it was supposed to be. I kinda knew it was supposed to be close am because I know I have checked them out already over a couple years ago and probably would have caught it if it was important. But I'm glad you could answer my question - thank you very much.
_________________ ~ Murph ~
|
|
|
|
|
 |
andysnovellNew Member
Posts: 8 Joined: 19 Aug 2004 Location: richmond, va
|
|
Posted: Sat Jul 02, 2005 6:54 pm |
|
|
Hi everyone, is the 1992-d supposed to have a wide or narrow "AM"???? Thanks! Andy
_________________ andrew t snovell
|
|
|
|
|
 |
joeyukAdvanced Member
Posts: 174 Joined: 13 Sep 2003 Location: Kearny,NJ
|
|
Posted: Sat Jul 02, 2005 7:27 pm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
ddorpmAdvanced Member
Posts: 101 Joined: 05 Mar 2005
|
|
Posted: Mon Jul 04, 2005 6:53 am |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|